Benchmarks
Iris consistently ranks among the fastest Go web frameworks. Below are detailed performance metrics and comparisons.
Performance Comparison
📖 Results from firing 200,000 requests with dynamic parameters, JSON request bodies, and JSON responses:
Framework | Language | Requests/sec | Latency | Throughput | Time To Complete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Iris | Go | 238,954 | 521.69µs | 64.15MB | 0.84s |
Gin | Go | 229,665 | 541.96µs | 62.86MB | 0.87s |
Chi | Go | 228,072 | 545.78µs | 62.61MB | 0.88s |
Echo | Go | 224,491 | 553.84µs | 61.70MB | 0.89s |
Martini | Go | 198,166 | 627.46µs | 54.47MB | 1.01s |
Kestrel | C# | 163,486 | 766.90µs | 47.42MB | 1.23s |
Buffalo | Go | 102,478 | 1.22ms | 28.14MB | 1.95s |
Koa | Javascript | 48,425 | 2.56ms | 15.39MB | 4.14s |
Express | Javascript | 23,622 | 5.25ms | 9.04MB | 8.41s |
Performance Metrics
Router Performance
- Route matching speed
- Parameter extraction efficiency
- Memory allocation per request
- Concurrent request handling
- Response time consistency
Memory Usage
- Heap allocations
- Garbage collection impact
- Memory footprint
- Resource utilization
- Memory leak prevention
Request Processing
- Request parsing speed
- Middleware execution time
- Handler invocation efficiency
- Response generation speed
- Error handling overhead
Best Practices
1. Performance Optimization
- Enable compression
- Implement caching
- Optimize routing patterns
- Minimize allocations
- Handle timeouts effectively
2. Testing Strategy
- Regular benchmarking
- Load testing
- Performance profiling
- Metrics monitoring
- Results documentation
3. Resource Management
- Connection pooling
- Memory optimization
- Resource cleanup
- Error recovery
- Graceful shutdown
4. Monitoring
- Performance metrics
- Resource utilization
- Error rates
- Response times
- System health